<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Friend Responds to Cannick&#8217;s Op-Ed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loganotron.com/2008/11/15/my-friend-responds-to-cannicks-op-ed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loganotron.com/2008/11/15/my-friend-responds-to-cannicks-op-ed/</link>
	<description>waxing blogosophical</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy.leblanc</title>
		<link>http://www.loganotron.com/2008/11/15/my-friend-responds-to-cannicks-op-ed/comment-page-1/#comment-6784</link>
		<dc:creator>amy.leblanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loganotron.com/?p=2456#comment-6784</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a great response, particularly the last 2 paragraphs.

a little bit on mz. cannick: she is a writer/critic who takes advantage of hot issues to write or say something decidedly positional in order to get herself some press (unfortunately, this is common among many self-proclaimed &quot;activists&quot;. she&#039;s only out to promote her self, her blog (which is an unabashededly self-promotional trainwreck) and get more traffic. it was entirely sensational, and her arguments barely made any sense. she isn&#039;t really out to solve social justice issues - note quality of the &quot;15 minutes&quot; of fame section on her blog - she&#039;s a niche media whore that follows the hottest topic and she just wants press. i can&#039;t find anything on her website that shows anything substantial that she&#039;s actually DONE in terms of real social change movement except talk a lot of shit. so why care what she thinks?

what&#039;s unfortunate is that people apparently listen to her.  sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a great response, particularly the last 2 paragraphs.</p>
<p>a little bit on mz. cannick: she is a writer/critic who takes advantage of hot issues to write or say something decidedly positional in order to get herself some press (unfortunately, this is common among many self-proclaimed &#8220;activists&#8221;. she&#8217;s only out to promote her self, her blog (which is an unabashededly self-promotional trainwreck) and get more traffic. it was entirely sensational, and her arguments barely made any sense. she isn&#8217;t really out to solve social justice issues &#8211; note quality of the &#8220;15 minutes&#8221; of fame section on her blog &#8211; she&#8217;s a niche media whore that follows the hottest topic and she just wants press. i can&#8217;t find anything on her website that shows anything substantial that she&#8217;s actually DONE in terms of real social change movement except talk a lot of shit. so why care what she thinks?</p>
<p>what&#8217;s unfortunate is that people apparently listen to her.  sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

